A weak trend of improvement in the Stifel Logistics Confidence Index is evident, though the Index is still short of the neutral 50 point mark.
With a fourth consecutive month-on-month increase registered in September, the Index for sea freight has shown that confidence appears to be creeping back into the industry, despite the well-cited capacity crisis. Unfortunately for Hanjin Shipping, this has not translated into enough container volumes for the carrier to survive; it filed for bankruptcy on Aug. 31.
Ironically, time may prove this event to be the turning point for the container shipping business. With a round of M&A activity initiated by several major carriers late last year, competition in this commoditized market has increasingly descended into a scrap over who can best sustain losses.
Should the South Korean Government elect not to intervene on behalf of Hanjin Shipping, the company’s death may well serve as a stay of execution for other carriers under financial pressure. According to the Journal of Commerce, Hanjin Shipping accounted for 7.85 percent of trans-Pacific containers inbound to the U.S. during the first half of 2015. Moreover, the shipping line accounted for around 9 percent of Asia-Mediterranean trade during the same period. Accordingly, the Shanghai Shipping Exchange measured a 51-percent increase in the spot rate for shipping a 40-foot container from Asia to the U.S. West Coast last week, to $1,746 per FEU.
It is logical to assume that this price rise, along with the general disruption to shippers, could incentivise many customers to switching their products to airfreight transportation, as with the West Coast labour dispute of 2014. The CEO of Atlas Air did note that “It [the bankruptcy] could mean opportunities for airfreight.” Nonetheless, he also suggested that the situation could change dramatically with the prospect of government intervention.
The overall Air Index recorded a 0.1 point rise, taking it to 49.3 for September. The current Index was down by 0.1 points to 45.1, whilst the expected Index rose 0.3 points to 53.5. The marginal overall gain was driven by a slight improvement in the expected situation.
For the current airfreight situation, lanes between Europe and Asia recorded poor performance, whilst those between Europe and the U.S. achieved gains. Europe-to-Asia was down slightly, by 0.1 points to 42.8, with a more significant fall of 1.5 points to 45.0 on the Asia to Europe lane. By contrast, the Europe-to-U.S. lane improved by 0.1 points to 46.7, with the U.S.-to-Europe lane rising 1.0 points to 46.1.
For the expected situation, all but one of the lanes surveyed noted month-on-month improvements. The exception was Europe-to-Asia, which fell by 3.2 points to 46.4. Meanwhile, Asia-to-Europe increased 0.8 points to 56.5, and U.S.-to-Europe improved by 0.9 points to 55.2. The most significant gain was recorded on the Europe-to-U.S. lane, which rose by 3.3 points to 56.2.
The Logistics Index for sea freight noted a minor increase of 0.6 points to 49.0. The expected Index fell by 0.2 points to 52.6, though this was offset by the 1.4 point increase in the present Index, which rose to 45.4.
The increase depicted in the present Index for sea freight was the result of gains across three of the four lanes. The outlier amongst the surveyed lanes was Europe-to-U.S., which declined by 0.6 points to 45.6. Meanwhile, Europe-to-Asia and Asia-to-Europe both recorded gains of 1.6 points, producing totals of 40.3 and 50.1, respectively. The most marked gain came on the U.S.-to-Europe lane, which increased by 3.3 points to 45.3.
The minor decline displayed within the expected Sea Freight Index was due to a mixed set of results amongst the lanes. Falling by 1.3 points to 54.8, the performance of the Europe-to-U.S. lane drove the result, whilst the Asia-to-Europe lane also fell, by 0.7 points to 54.0. Somewhat offsetting the downward trend, Europe to Asia gained 1.1 points to total 49.8, though this was not enough to arrest the overall decline, as the U.S.-to-Europe lane remained unchanged at 51.8.
By Transport Intelligence via Supply Chain Brain